9.2
Rasulullah (s)
was taught Urdu by the Nasibis

Rashid Ahmad Gangohi, whilst extolling the virtues of the Deoband Madrassa (The main
school of learning in Nasibi ideology in the Indian subcontinent) writes the
following:
"Once a great scholar saw the Prophet (saws) in a dream speaking Urdu, he
asked him where he learnt to speak Urdu when he was an Arabic speaker, the
Prophet (saws) replied I learnt Urdu following my contact with the Deoband
Madrassa".
Al
Baraheynul Kathahaat, by Rashid Ahmad Gangohi, page 26 (published in Kutubkhana
Imdaadeyaa, Deoband, Uttar Pradesh).
Is there no level that the Nasibis will stoop in seeking to deceive the people?
They have the audacity to proclaim that they taught the Seal of all Prophets -
whose sole mission was to teach mankind. This is the belief of scholars who
claim that they and they alone are the upholders of truth. The ordinary Muslim
would view seeing the Prophet (s) blessed shoe as better than his life and here
we have a Nasibi scholar declaring that not only did he meet the Prophet (s) in
a dream but also he attended the Madrassa of the Nasibis!
> We would like to pose this question to the Nasibi since their Imam ibn
Taymeeya said that the devil can appear as the Prophet (saw), how do they know
that it wasn't the devil who appeared as the Prophet (saw) claiming to have
learned urdu from the Deobandis and not the actual Prophet? Was it not possible
that Shaythan had appeared in order to give the Deobandis a false sense of
superiority?'

9.3
Sayyida Fatima
(as) embraces a Nasibi Scholar

Allamah Ashraf Ali Thanvi claims to have
been inspired by this dream:
"I dreamt that I saw Fatima (ra) taking me to her bosom, thereafter I
became good"
"Hafazathul Yaumia Thanvi" Volume 6 page 37
Thanvi might not have any shame but we would urge Muslims to think about the
status of the person being defamed here, this is the daughter of Rasulullah
(s), the Leader of the Women of Paradise (this hadith can be found in Sahih al
Bukhari (English translation Volume 4 hadith number 819). Sayyida (as)
exemplified piety and perfection and Muslims look to her as the perfect role
model as a mother and daughter. Yet this third rate Nasibi claims that Sayyida
Fatima (as) would embrace him, a non mahram man! May Allah's curse be upon
these people.

10.
The Nasibis
assault on Hadhrath Ayesha

10.1
Nasibi slander on
Hadhrath Ayesha

Ibn Kathir writes the following:
"Hadhrath Ayesha was accused of illicit relations. Those responsible for
spreading this allegation were Hadhrath Abu Bakr's cousin Mustha bin Hasasa and
the Prophet's sister in law Humna binte Hajash and the poet Hasan bin Thabit.
The Prophet ordered that they be flogged and they were punished
accordingly"
al Bidayah al Nihaya by Ibn Kathir on page 160, Chapter
"Dhir Ahfak"
To those Nasibis who say that we slander Ayesha and thus are Kaffirs we invite
them to ponder, the first to slander her were the companions hence they are
kaffirs!
If you base Iman on love for Hadhrath Ayesha then we should remind the people
that the Nasibis are guilty of this insult and yet target the Shi'as. This can
be proven from the next wonderful hadith.

10.2
Nasibi attack on
Hadhrath Ayesha's dignity

Before analysing the text let us pose the
following questions to those with rational minds:
If two of
your relatives went to your home and asked your mother about how to
perform Ghusl after sex how would you react?
Is it not
an insult to ask such a question to your mother?
How would
you feel if your mother then provided a practical demonstration by
removing her clothes and taking a bath?

With this in mind we invite you to ponder
over this hadith:
Abu Salama b. 'Abd al-Rahman reported: I along with the foster brother of
'A'isha went to her and he asked about the bath of the Apostle (may peace be
upon him) because of sexual intercourse. She called for a vessel equal to a Sa'
and she took a bath, and there was a curtain between us and her. She poured
water on her head thrice and he (Abu Salama) said: The wives of the Apostle
(may peace be upon him) collected hair on their heads and these lopped up to
ears (and did not go beyond that).
Sahih Muslim, Book 003, Number 0626:
Perhaps the Nasibis would be so kind as to answer these questions:
As the
query was with regards to Ghusl after intercourse, could the two men not
have obtained the information from one of the male companions?
As the
matter was linked to Sexual intercourse both men must have been married
so why couldn't they send their respective wives to ask this most delicate
question?
Why would
Aisha find it necessary to take a bath' to demonstrate the point could
she not have simply relayed actions verbally with her clothes on?
If there
was a net between them that presumable acted as purdah does this not
defeat the object of Aisha removing her clothes and demonstrating how
Ghusl is performed?
The net
clearly was NOT very thick, since they were able to observe that Aisha had
placed her hair over her head they could even SEE her ears through it.
Is such a
hadith not an insult on the dignity of Hadhrath Aisha?

Alhamdolillah we the Shi'a do NOT believe
such hadith that attack the dignity of Hadhrath Aisha, it is unfortunate that
Nasibis regard such traditions as Sahih. If those that slander Aisha are kaafir
what about those that regard this hadith to be Sahih?

10.3
The Shaykhain's
attack on Hadhrath Ayesha

We read the following in Sahih Muslim -
Book 009, Number 3506:
Jabir b. 'Abdullah (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Abu Bakr (Allah be
pleased with him) came and sought permission to see Allah's Messenger (may
peace be upon him). He found people sitting at his door and none amongst them
had been granted permission, but it was granted to Abu Bakr and he went in.
Then came 'Umar and he sought permission and it was granted to him, and he
found Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him) sitting sad and silent with his
wives around him. He (Hadrat 'Umar) said: I would say something which would
make the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) laugh, so he said: Messenger of
Allah, I wish you had seen (the treatment meted out to) the daughter of Khadija
when you asked me some money, and I got up and slapped her on her neck. Allah's
Messenger (may peace be upon him) laughed and said: They are around me as you
see, asking for extra money. Abu Bakr (Allah be pleased with him) then got up
went to 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with her) and slapped her on the neck, and
'Umar stood up before Hafsa and slapped her saying: You ask Allah's Messenger
(may peace be upon him) which he does not possess. They said: By Allah, we do
not ask Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) for anything he does not
possess. Then he withdrew from them for a month or for twenty-nine days. Then
this verse was revealed to him:" Prophet: Say to thy wives... for a mighty
reward" (xxxiii. 28). He then went first to 'A'isha (Allah be pleased with
her) and said: I want to propound something to you, 'A'isha, but wish no hasty
reply before you consult your parents. She said: Messenger of Allah, what is
that? He (the Holy Prophet) recited to her the verse, whereupon she said: Is it
about you that I should consult my parents, Messenger of Allah? Nay, I choose
Allah, His Messenger, and the Last Abode; but I ask you not to tell any of your
wives what I have said He replied: Not one of them will ask me without my
informing her. God did not send me to be harsh, or cause harm, but He has sent
me to teach and make things easy.
The fact that the Shaykhain attacked their respective daughters is irrelevant
BECAUSE they are Umm'ul Momineen of ALL MUSLIMS.
This being the case, Nasibis answer this:
If insulting
Ummul Momineen makes you a kaafir what about those that attack them
physically?
What sort
of respect is this, attacking Rasulullah (s) wives in his blessed
presence?

10.4
Hadhrath Abu
Bakr attacks Hadhrath Ayesha and declares her an enemy of God

Imam of Ahl'ul Sunnah Abdul Hamid Ghazzali
records the following in his classic Ihya Ulum-id-din:
"Once there was an altercation between the Prophet and Hazrat Ayesha when
they found Hazrat Abu Bakr as judge. Hazrat Ayesha said to the Prophet: You
speak but don't speak except truth. At once Hazrat Abu Bakr gave her such a
slap that blood began to ooze out from her mouth".
Ihya Ulum-id-din by Imam Ghazali, Volume 2 page 36,
Chapter "The secrets of marriage" English translation by Maulana Fazlul
Karim.
For those Nasibis who accuse the Shi'a of criticising Hadhrath Aisha we suggest
they analyse this narration carefully. Can you get any greater insult that
declaring the "mother of the faithful" an Enemy of God?

10.5
The Nasibis Kufr
Fatwa on Hadhrath Ayesha

In the renowned book "Mawaddathul Qurba" by
Imam of Ahl'ul Sunnah, Sayyid Ali Hamdani we read the following:
"Hadhrath Ayesha narrates the Prophet said Allah asked me Whoever doesn't
accept Ali's khilafath and rebels and fights him as a kaffir and will perish in
the fire" Someone asked her "Why did you rebel and fight him?" She replied "I
forgot this Hadith on the Day of the Battle of Jamal, I remembered it again
when I returned to Basra and I asked for Allah's forgiveness, I don't think
that I will be forgiven for this sin"
Mawaddatul Qurba by S. Ali Hamdani page 32 under the
chapter "Mawaddatul Saum"
We will all die one day and will reply for our deeds, look at your books and
ponder over Hadhrath Ayesha's own admission.
Mufti Muhammad Qulli has also recorded this Hadith in "Tashdheed al
Muthain" and the Nasibis have expunged these words 'Wa ma asee un
youqoon'

10.6
Hadhrath Ayesha's
kufr Fatwa on Hadhrath Uthman

The pages of history are replete with these
words uttered by Hadhrath Ayesha against Hadhrath Uthman:
"Kill this old fool (Na'thal), for he is unbeliever"
63 Tarikh by Ibn Athir, v3, p206
Lisan al-Arab by Ibn Masur, v14, p141
al-Iqd al-Farid, v4, p290
Qadi Burhaniddin in Sirathul Halbiyya writes:
"Ameerul Momineen Ali bin Abi Talib prior to Jamal write a letter to
Ayesha saying "Only yesterday you said kill Uthman, May Allah kill him,
Uthman has become a kaffir"
Sirathul Halabiyya Volume 3 page 356 "Muhjizatha
Nabi"
Other classical Sunni sources have also recorded the same words of Imam Ali (as).
The issuing takfir on Uthman by Hadhrath Ayesha has been eulogised in poetry by
Ubayd bin Abi Salmah:
"You ordered the murder of Uthman by stating he had become a
kaffir".
Tadhkirathul Khawaas al Ummah, Ibn Jauzi page 38
"Dhikr Jamal"
Al Manaqib al Khawazmi page 117
Nasibis should know that kufr Fatwas are not just on Shi'as but also on your
leader Uthman by your mother Ayesha. The issuing of takfir is a very serious
matter, Abu Tharr narrates he heard Rasulullah (s) state:
"If somebody accuses another of Fusuq (by calling him 'Fasiq' i.e. a
wicked person) or accuses him of Kufr, such an accusation will revert to him
(i.e. the accuser) if his companion (the accused) is innocent."
(Sahih al Bukhari, Volume 8 hadith number 71)
In addition to this we also read that:
Ibn Umar related that the Holy Prophet said: If a Muslim calls another
kafir, then if he is a kafir let it be so; otherwise, he [the caller] is
himself a kafir.''
(Abu Dawud, Book of Sunna, edition published by Quran Mahal, Karachi, vol. iii,
p. 484)
Since Ayesha issued takfir upon Uthman then one of them became an infidel. The
Nasibis need to decide which of them is the kafir here.

10.7
The Nasibi
verdict that Hadhrath Ayesha hated Ali (as)

'Ali Muttaqi al Hind records the following:
"Hadhrath Ali says Hadhrath Ayesha fought me because firstly being a woman
she possessed a weak judgement and secondly she bore enmity towards me and it
would open in the same way a pot is opened. She would have never fought anyone
other than me in that way".
Kanz ul Ummal, by 'Ali Muttaqi al Hind Chapter 8 Kitab
"Mawa azafee katheeya'thul taweela" In the authentic "Umdah
al Qari fi Sharh Sahih al Bukhari", by Badr al Din Hanafi we read
that:
"Hadhrath Ayesha, could not bearing hearing a good thing about Ali, and
this is solid evidence of her being an enemy of Ali, for Nasibis to proclaim