بیشترتوضیحاتافزودن یادداشت جدید Table 7.1 for this purpose. If there are significant doubts about the reliability of relevant computer systems and processes, the court may decide to give the associated digital evidence less weight in the final decision.On the stand, digital investigators may be asked to testify to the reliability of the original evidence, the collection and analysis systems and processes, assert that they personally collected and verified the data, and established the chain of custody. An unexplained break in the chain of custody could be used to exclude evidence. An understanding of direct versus circumstantial evidence, hearsay, and scientific evidence is necessary to develop solid conclusions and to defend those conclusions and the associated evidence on the stand. A failure to understand these concepts can weaken an examiner's conclusions and testimony. For instance, interpreting circumstantial evidence as though it were direct evidence, or basing conclusions on hearsay, could undermine an examiner's findings and credibility.Ultimately, digital evidence examiners must present their findings in court to a non-technical audience. As with any presentation, the key to success is preparation, preparation, and more preparation. Be familiar with all aspects of the case, anticipate questions, rehearse answers, and prepare visual presentations to address important issues. Although this requires a significant amount of effort, keep in mind that someone's liberty might be at stake.
لطفا منتظر باشید ...
