MODERN PHILOSOPHY [Electronic resources] نسخه متنی

اینجــــا یک کتابخانه دیجیتالی است

با بیش از 100000 منبع الکترونیکی رایگان به زبان فارسی ، عربی و انگلیسی

MODERN PHILOSOPHY [Electronic resources] - نسخه متنی

| نمايش فراداده ، افزودن یک نقد و بررسی
افزودن به کتابخانه شخصی
ارسال به دوستان
جستجو در متن کتاب
بیشتر
تنظیمات قلم

فونت

اندازه قلم

+ - پیش فرض

حالت نمایش

روز نیمروز شب
جستجو در لغت نامه
بیشتر
لیست موضوعات
توضیحات
افزودن یادداشت جدید




The Philosophy of Freidrich
Wilhelm von Schelling &


Friedrich Schleiermacher




TABLE OF CONTENTS


I.
Friedrich Wilhelm von Schelling

  • Life and Works

  • Doctrine


  • II.
    Friedrich Schleiermacher




    I. Friedrich Wilhelm von Schelling


    Life and Works


    Friedrich
    Schelling (
    picture) was born in 1775 at
    Leonberg, a small town of Wurttemberg. At the age of sixteen he
    entered the theological seminary at Tubingen, where he studied theology,
    philosophy and philology.


    A
    schoolmate, disciple and friend of Hegel, he later broke with
    him and became one of his most severe opponents. Called to lecture at Jena in 1798, Schelling
    had Fichte and Hegel as colleagues there, and came
    into close contact with the Romanticists. From 1803 to 1806 Schelling
    lectured at Wurzburg. Between 1806 and 1820 he was a
    member of the Academy of Sciences, with residence in Munich.


    Next
    he went to Erlangen and lectured there for about
    six years before returning to Munich to teach philosophy. Finally he
    accepted an invitation to lecture in Berlin, where he succeeded to the
    chair Hegel had held. Schelling died in 1854.


    Schelling's most systematic philosophical
    works are: System des Transcendentalen Idealismus (System of Transcendental Idealism, and Darstellung meines
    Systems (Exposition of My System).


    Doctrine


    ,
    differing fromKant, had
    given to the thinking ego a metaphysical reality, making it the unique
    creative principle of the world of nature. According to Fichte,
    the ego produces nature by means of unconscious activity, and the
    reality of nature is nothing other than a conscious "representation"
    of the empirical ego.


    Schelling accepts Fichte's
    concept of Pure Ego as the unique metaphysical principle, but he differs
    from Fichte in his concept of nature. Nature,
    according to Schelling, has its own metaphysical
    reality, independent of the rising consciousness of the empirical ego. The
    Absolute (the Pure Ego of Fichte) must be conceived
    of as the complete identity of the Universal Spirit and nature.


    Making
    use of new concepts in the field of electricity and transferring them to philosophy,
    Schelling maintains that the Spirit and nature must
    be conceived as two poles, positive and negative, of the reality of the
    Absolute, completely identical and inseparable from one another. The production
    of nature is due to the fact that the pole of nature prevails over the pole of
    the spirit through the unconscious action of the Absolute. This prevalence,
    however, can never reach the point of nullifying the presence of the Universal
    Spirit, for both the Spirit and nature are insuppressible.


    Hence
    nature is internally spiritualized, endowed with life, organic functions and
    finality. Mechanical causality is a secondary means for the actuation of
    finality. The finalistic and organic tendency of nature becomes visible in the
    living being, in which the various parts act for the good of the whole.


    The
    Universal Spirit, always present in nature, makes it possible for empirical
    consciousness (individual egos) to arise; that is to say, the Spirit, after
    long wandering unconsciously in nature, becomes conscious in empirical egos --
    or rather, the presence of the Spirit in nature is an essential condition for
    the emergence of empirical egos.


    The
    consciousness of the Universal Spirit first appears in sensation. The odyssey
    of the Spirit has ended, and an inverse process has begun. The Spirit, by
    reflection, reconquers that which it had produced in
    the shadows of the unconscious. This process is the work of philosophy, which
    goes back and considers the stages or moments through which the Absolute became
    nature and consciousness.


    For Schelling, neither practical nor theoretical activity gives
    us the model of the primitive identity of the Absolute as Spirit-nature.
    The creative activity of art alone is capable of giving us such a model.
    Indeed, a work of artistic genius is the result of two distinct activities,
    that is, the unconscious activity of inspiration and the conscious
    activity of the artist. Art, therefore, is the organ of philosophy,
    because art alone brings to philosophy a concrete representation of the unconscious
    process by which action is identified with consciousness. Thus art is the
    representation of the unbroken unity of the Absolute Principle.


    II. Friedrich Schleiermacher


    Friedrich
    Schleiermacher (
    picture), a German
    Protestant theologian and philosopher, was born at Breslau in 1768. He was a lecturer and
    professor at Halle and Berlin. He died in 1834. His most
    representative works are Reden uber die Religion (Sermons on Religion) and Der christliche Glaube (The Christian Faith).


    With Schleiermacher, the Romantic idealism of Schelling takes the form of manifestations of interiority,
    religiosity, and sentiment. The perfect identity of the Absolute, and, at the
    same time, our absolute dependence upon the Absolute can be grasped only in
    these interior activities.


    According
    to Schleiermacher, the Absolute is an actual
    reality, the immanent content of our consciousness, and the perennial source of
    the life of our spirit. Neither thought nor will can arrive at the Absolute and
    comprehend it as perfect unity. Theoretical thought is possible only in so far
    as a limited perceptible world is presupposed; and likewise, will is possible
    only in so far as there is presupposed a limited end to be attained. In both
    cases the ego must have a relationship to something which is different from
    itself. Some kind of communication between the finite and the infinite must be
    established.


    If we
    are recollected and place our ego in relation to itself, this self-consciousness
    or sentiment makes it possible for us to comprehend the absolute unity
    of Being, God. During such a period of recollection, we feel, on the one hand,
    that we are submerged in the infinite Being and, on the other, that the
    infinite Being seems to be concentrated in one point of our consciousness.


    In
    this sentiment man does not lose consciousness of himself but is aware that he
    and his being are rooted in God. Thus man comprehends the absolute dependence
    of his being upon God, of the finite upon the infinite. The sentiment of the Divine
    in ourselves is religion, in which the entire series of particular and
    determined acts of our lives find their motive.


    / 30