The
pseudo-Mahdi of the nineteenth century
Mahdi-e-Sudani
The
fact is that if there had been no false claimants of Mahdaviyat the belief
of Mahdaviyat would have been labeled as artificial and un lslamic. But since
the dawn of Islam there had been a continuous flow of false claimants from
among the perpretors of falsehood. They have appeared in various corners of
the world.
In the 19th century some people claimed to be special deputies (Naib Khaas)
of Imam Mahdi (A.T.F.S.) and for some days propagated their false claims.
Later when they found that it is not sufficient for their vile purposes they
claimed to be the Mahdi and then claimed prophethood. But this claim did not
influence the majority of the people. Only some selfish or gullible people
supported their claim. Hence, ultimately they claimed divinity.
The reason behind the writing of this article is to prove that due to these
false claimants, the sensible and impartial people conclude that the belief
in Mahdaviyat is not unlslamic. Neither is it exclusive to any particular
sect of Islam. The Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) has informed about it sometimes to
his family members and sometimes among his companions.
The utterances of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) make it clear that the belief
of Mahdi (A.T.F.S.) is a belief from the foundations of Islamic doctrine.
The rejection of this belief renders one an infidel. The compiler of the book
'Yanaabiul Mawadda', Sulaiman Qundoozi Hanafi has recorded the following tradition
:-
One who rejects the rising of Al-Mahdi (A.T.F.S.), has committed infidelity.
Numerous such traditions and reports are to be found. Yet, many scholars have
quite strangely objected to this belief and have not even cared for the sayings
of the righteous companions. The foremost among these are the Egyptian writers
Ahmed Amin and great exegesis of Qur'an, Allama Tantavi Jauhari. According
to them "the belief in the reappearance of Imam Mahdi (A.T.F.S.), alone,
is responsible for the various conflicts among the people and the various
uprisings which have weakened the Muslim world. This belief has caused a great
dissension among Muslims." They have tried through their writings to
spread poison among the
people and take them away from the belief in Mahdaviyat; whereas the belief
is absolutely Islamic and it guarantees hope, steadfastness and assurance
to the society.
If Ahmed Amin had applied common sense, studied history and sociology, he
would have found that people have misused everything to achieve their evil
designs, be that, rights blessings, truth, accord, justice, trust, truthfulness,
civilization, culture, education, training, progress, innovation, religion,
faith, independence, democracy etc. All these have been misused in the past,
now and shall always be in the future too. So much so that they have not left
alone even the belief in Allah and the prophethood. Then they turned their
attention towards the "Belief of Mahdaviyat" and rejected it as
an artificial belief. They tried in vain to support their allegations with
lame arguments. They failed to disprove it and were themselves degraded. Actually
they did not deserve even this much attention. Anyway, inspite of such objections
and allegations the belief of Mahdaviyat was unaffected. No doubt, if something
is based on truth cannot be refuted.
This steadiness is the proof of this belief being an Islamic belief. Hence,
many selfish and power hungry people from among the Shias and the Sunnis raised
false claims of Mahdaviyat and spread strife among the people. One such power
hungry and greedy gobbler Mahdi-e-Sudani.
The life of Mahdi-e-Sudani:
Mahdi Sudani was born in 1848 at the Sudanese village of Dolga which was the
village of boat builders. He is the claimant who became the most well-known
pseudo-Mahdi in Europe. His actual name was Mohammad Ahmad and he assumed
the title of Mahdi. By displaying excessive piety, he gained respect and honour
at the age of twenty-two years. He was an eloquent speaker and condemned the
Egyptian authorities in his speeches. He exposed the tyranny of the rulers
to the people and laid great stress upon the re-appearance of Mahdi.
This self-proclaimed deputy of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) and the false leader
of the Muslims raised the standard of revolt in Sudan where existed the corrupt
government of Egyptians in connivance with the oppressive Britishers . In
his eloquent speeches he condemned the tyranny of the Egyptians to such an
extent that the dislike for Egyptians became imbued among the Sudanese people.
He made special references to Imam Mahdi (A.T.F.S.) and gradually proclaimed
himself to be connected with the Mahdi as per the usual practice of the false
claimants at the start of their claim. Finally, he claimed to be Mahdi himself
from the lineage of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.), the 12th Imam and the son of
Imam Hasan Askari (A.S.).
After obtaining basic education, he entered into the Sanusiya Sufi order and
on the Island of Abba began to spent his time in meditation. His false claim
of Mahdaviyat received support for the first time on this Island which is
150 miles south of Khartoum.
A group of people pledged allegiance to him and he made a secret claim of
Mahdaviyat.
Some historians state that after joining the Sanusiya Sufi order he had an
argument with his Peer (Sufi guide) and hence began to collect his own disciples
and subsequently claimed to be Mahdi of the time and the last Imam. At the
outset only Abdullah Al-Taaisha (Caliph) supported and advised him to accompany
him to a place where the militant tribes could be instigated to rise in revolt.
In May 1881 the Egyptian government issued an order for him to present himself
in Khartoum and clarify his position. But Mohammad Ahmad ignored this order,
assumed rulership of the country and declared holy war against the infidels
as well as the progressive Muslims.
The Egyptian government dispatched an army of two hundred soldiers under Rauf
Pasha to subdue him. On 11th of August the Egyptians landed on the Island
of Abba to attack the followers of Mohammad Ahmad. The supporters of Mohammad
Ahmad did not possess any fire arms so they kept themselves hidden till night
fell. As soon as it was dark they surrounded the Egyptian army and attacked
it ferociously till the complete army was wiped out. After this Mohammad Ahmad
fled to a secluded place where the possibility of retaliation from the Egyptian
army did not exist. On the way he met the local leaders from whom he learned
that there was great discontent among the people regarding the Egyptian government.
The abolishing of slave trade was also a cause of economic unrest.
At the Jebel Ghadir he had to face the men of Yusuf
Pasha and they compelled him to retrace his steps. In May 1882 the Egyptian
government dispatched an army of 6000 to attack Mohammad Ahmad. One night,
Mohammad Ahmad attacked the army of Yusuf Pasha and put them to death. After
victory Mohammad Ahmad gained more clout and was joined by many people greedy
for the spoils of war.
In the last part of the month of November 1882 Mohammad Ahmad concluded that
he had sufficient military strength to capture the Egyptian fort of Al-Abeed.
So he attacked Al- Abeed and captured it. Then he converted the fort as his
residents and made it the seat of power.
Mohammad Ahmad used to wear a simple cotton dress.
His followers also imitated him in his style of dressing. Outwardly he put
up a facade of simplicity but used to lead a life of sensuality in secret.
Women were his weakness. He tried to imitate the conditions of the Holy Prophet
(S.A.W.) and called his wife Ummul Momeneen Ayesha. He also named his followers
after the companions of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) viz. Abu Bakr, Umar, Hassaan
ibn Saabit, Khalid bin Waleed, etc. The common followers were called as helpers
(Ansar) He seemed to bring about the condition similar to the time of the
Holy Prophet of Islam (S.A.W.). But actually it was not so. If it had not
been the spread of oppression by the British and the Egyptians, this pseudo
Mahdi would never had succeeded. But the oppressed people were tired of the
tyranny and hence various tribes joined hands with Mohammad Ahmad.
When Mohammad Ahmad traveled for the first time from the Island of Abba towards
Masat he termed his journey as "Hijrat" - migration. He also appointed
his four caliphs. The first caliph was Abdullah Al-Taaisha. He was given the
title of Abu Bakr. He pretended to establish a rule on the Qur'anic principles
but the actual fact was that he wanted to put up this false show so that he
could collect people under himself. In order to administer the country, he
collected both Zakaat and Khums. But the distribution of the same was with
favoritism. He prohibited the study of religion and Fiqh. He only stressed
on the recitation of the Holy Our'an but strictly prohibited any discussion
on it. Like the
Wahabis he prohibited the consumption of tobacco and considered it. more sinful
than drinking wine. He did not forgive even the smallest of the sins.
Due to the Egyptian and the British rule, Sudan was passing through a very
critical period. The British dispatched an army of 10,000 under William to
attack Mohammad Ahmad. On the 3rd of November Mohammad Ahmad reached Kashgil
to confront the army and inflicted a terrible defeat upon it.
Now the whole of Sudan was virtually under his control.
In December 1884 the army sent by Salauddin Pasha under an Austrian officer
was defeated by Mohammad Ahmad after a conflict which lasted a whole year.
At this defeat the British prepared to flee Sudan. In order to facilitate
this exit, General Charles George Gordon was dispatched. Prior to this, he
had held the post of the Governor General of Sudan and hence was very popular
among the locals.
Secondly he was capable to handle Mohammad Ahmad who had by now established
himself as the Mahdi and the complete master of Sudan. He reached Khartoum
on the 18th February 1884 and made an offer of recognizing the rule of Mohammad
Ahmad if he would free all the prisoners. He also offered to permit the resumption
of the slave trade.
Instead of accepting these conditions Mohammed Ahmad prepared to attack Khartoum
and on the 22nd August laid siege to the city. Even though he could not [ace
the fire arms and the sophisticated weapons he prolonged the siege so much
that the people began to worry. There was a great shortage of the necessities
of ;ife in the city as Mohammad Ahmad had prevented all sort of communication.
Mohammad Ahmad found the time ripe for his purpose and entered the city on
25th January 1885 and started plunder and destruction.
General Gordon was killed just outside his palace. Sudan was completely lost
to the British and Mohammad Ahmad made Khartoum the seat of his Caliphate.
In order that he may exercise a complete control over sudan he sealed all
the borders and even prohibited the aeople from going for Hajj.
this false Mahdi died on 22nd June 1885 due to high ever. He had already appointed
Abdullah Al-Taaisha as his successor but due to his weak disposition he faced
defeat at the hands of General Kitchener. Sudan once again fell into the hands
of the British. In order to take revenge the British dug up the grave of Mohammad
Ahmad, cut off his head and sent it to England.
May Allah protect us all from such power hungry and misguiding "Mahdis".
Up till now we have written about the 'Mahdi' who raised his false claim in
Sudan and whose name was Mohammad Ahmad. A short account of his life has been
given of the same. As we have stated in the beginning the instances of the
claimants of Mahdaviyat had been since the early period of Islam and in the
future too there are possibilities of it. The ignorant and the foolish or
the selfish people have also accepted their claims. There have been some false
claimants where the affair is still continued in their progeny generation
after generation. These claims were raised by taking the assistance of the'
tradition of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) wherein he says
"Mahdi will appear from My Ahlebayt and fill the earth with justice and
equity like it has been filled with oppressions and tyranny."
But the false claimants only referred to this part of the hadith for their
selfish motives. The truth demands that they should also have studied those
traditions and fulfilled the conditions where the hadith describes the special
characteristic of Mahdi (A.T.F.S.).
Even for the time being if we consider that the false
claimants had ulterior motives and selfishness in raising their claims, then
what shall we say of those people who propagate these claims even after these
claimants have died.
They are foremost in spreading their false propaganda and pretend to be knowledgeable
and intelligent when they are cornered by logical arguments and scriptual
proofs they try to defend their allegations by means of far-fetched arguments
and intricate derivations and complex explanations. They try to skirt the
issue very cunningly.
For the benefit of our reader we quote the tradition of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.)
which speaks clearly about the characteristics features of Mahdi (A.T.F.S.)
where there is no scope for individual interpretations or deductions. The
false claimants support their claim by this hadith but, when the same hadith
speaks of the
characteristic feature of Mahdi they pretend to be ignorant.
Readers are requested to read the following tradition and in the light of
the characteristic feature of Mahdi (A.T.F.S.) mentioned in it compare the
various claimants of Mahdaviyat who, time and again have raised the banner
of misguidance and led astray a substantial number of gullible people.
The days of the world will not end and the time will not be over till the
Arab world is not ruled by a person from My Ahlebayt (A.S.) whose name shall
be My name.
(MusnadAhmad Hanbal Pub.l313A.I1., vol.1, page 376}
In the light of this tradition let us see if any of the claimants have fulfilled
the criteria. Even if we include all the Sadaat (Syed) among the progeny of
the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) there had been only two claimants who had been Sadaat.
One was Syed Bab and the other was Syed Mohammad Jaunpuri. They had raised
their respective claims in Iran and India. The hadith says that the Mahdi
(A.T.F.S.) will rule the Arab world but these two did not attain post of even
the Tehsildar (administrative officer) in their own villages. Then how is
it possible for us to accept their claims?
Even if a day remains for the time to end certainly Allah will send a man
from My progeny who will fill the earth with justice and equity like it had
been filled with injustice and oppression.
(Sunan Abi .Da wood vol.2, Page 207, Egyptian edition)
Kindly note that all the claimants since the beginning of Islam have raised
their claims with a great show of pomp and glory but none of them have been
able to fill the earth with justice and equity. Rather, there has been an
increase in corruption and injustice and oppression more prevalent. Instead
of an atmosphere of peace and prosperity there had been a reign of wars and
terror, death and destruction. And this is increasing each day. Not far from
us, in the 19th century Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani raised his false claim
from Punjab. At' least the banner of peace and prosperity and equity and justice
should have been established in India if not over the whole world. But we
have all seen how the British unleashed a reign of terror and that too in
his time. He watched it silently and instead of speaking about justice and
equity he and his followers adhered to the
commands of the British. Instead of the propagation of amity the country itself
was partitioned. The Punjab where he raised his claim itself was divided into
two parts. Even today all sorts of destruction is prevalent in Punjab like
the other parts of the country or rather like other countries.
In the light of the tradition of the Holy Prophet (S.A.W.) it is against the
dignity of the Mahdi whom Allah is to send to establish justice and peace.
The same could be said regarding Ali Mohammad Shirazi Bab. The subject of
this essay, Mahdi Sudani should also be measured with the. same yardstick.
Because it is not possible to go into more details in this brief essay let
us conclude with a couplet which can be a pointer for the intended explanation
:
Let me see if there is one who could fill the cup of every person otherwise
all who came claimed to be the Spiritual guides.