Index
P
Pacific Gas & Electric. See 160-162
Parnas, D., 31-33, 48
Partial abandonment, 18-21
Patton, M. Q., 197, 198
Petroski, H., on engineering failures, 189, 213, 254
PG&E Customer Information System, 4
Phar-Mur Luc, involved in Delta project, 94, 123
Philcox, Hank, consultant on Delta project, 131
Pinnacle, involved in Delta project, 130
179, 181, 182
Postabandonment review, 190, 191, 197, 217, 218, 241
Postdevelopment review, 190, 195, 217
Postmodernist, approach to software development, 37, 67
Postmortems, 252, 254
analysis of, 190, 192-196, 210, 216, 217
survey results, 201-208
Powers, R. F., 178, 181
Pressman, R. S., 161
Problem formulation, inherent difficulties, 29, 33-35, 37
Process models, of software development, 10
Programs, P- and E- programs, 212
Project abandonment decision, 103. See also Project cancellation decision
Project audits, 247, 248
Project cancellation decision, 7, 16, 156, 169, 243
sensitivity in handling, 247, 251-252
Project consultants, 248, 249
Project environment, 192, 193
Project failures, 13
causes of, 151, 155, 182
handling aftermath of, 239-241, 251, 253, 254
learning from, 201, 211, 213, 218
minimizing risk of, 221, 222, 226, 227, 230
Project features, 224. See also System functionalities
Project financing, 156, 168
Project goals and objectivescontributes to economic factors, 140, 143, 150, 152
contributes to socioorganizational factors, 84, 89, 92, 93, 95, 96, 103, 104, 105
contributes to sociotechnical factors, 107, 109-111, 133, 134
impact on all software development phases, 51, 55, 56-58, 60, 61, 64, 65, 67
learning from project failures, 212, 218
role in failure of CODIS, 156-158, 160, 175, 179
role in successful project outcomes, 222, 224, 226, 235, 236, 240, 243, 244, 247
Project investigators, role in postabandonment reviews, 194, 197-201, 218, 219
Project leadersoverall significance in software development, 241-243, 245-250, 254
role in managing elements project triangle, 223, 224, 226, 228, 230, 232, 236
role in postabandonment review, 218, 219
role in successful project outcomes, 156, 158, 159, 165, 175
Project management. See Project leaders, Project managers
Project management and control contributes to failure of CODIS, 156, 161
contributes to technical factors, 111, 115, 117, 118, 120
impact on design and implementation stages, 52, 58, 59, 65
role in postabandonment review, 212, 218, 240, 247
Project managers, on project risk, 16, 41, 55, 63
role in software development practice, 85, 113, 140
Project requirements. See Requirements
Project resources significance in successful project222-224, 226, 228-230, 233-236, 242
Project reviews, 247, 248
Project risks, 14, 16, 29, 33, 37, 41-45. See also Risk-assessment
Project runaways, 251. See also Software runaways
Project schedule. See Schedule delays
Project selection, 16, 17, 231-233, 236, 243, 247
Project size and complexityeffect on cost and schedule estimates, 137, 148
factor in software failures, 29-32, 35, 36, 38, 40, 48, 92, 174, 240-242
Project team compositionfactor in software failures, 11, 29, 30, 36, 37, 40, 44, 52
impact on failure of CODIS, 156, 158, 160, 161, 179
impact on project success, 222, 224, 226-228, 230, 231, 234, 235, 237
impact on technical and economic factors, 58, 65, 107, 111, 112, 133, 138
role in minimizing project failures, 244-249, 252, 254
role in postabandonment review, 218, 219
Project termination decision. See Project cancellation decision
Project triangle, impact on project success, 224, 228, 233-236, 242, 246. See also 30, 33, 37
Przasnyski, Z. H., 13, 15
empirical analysis of Fortune 500failed projects, 73, 74-83, 108, 111, 140, 141, 154, 199, 202
on project failures and aftermath, 239, 244, 247, 252, 253
on types of abandonment, 17-22